Group vs Cell vs Pure Captive Solutions at a Glance

This Captives.Insure guide outlines the distinctions between group, cell, and pure captive structures. Group captives spread risk and cost sharing among members, offering lower capital requirements but less individual autonomy. Cell captives provide ring-fenced liability for participants, lowering frictional costs and enabling faster access to surplus. Pure captives are single-parent vehicles offering maximum flexibility and control over underwriting, capital, and service provider choices. The article is designed to help organisations assess which structure best fits unique risk profiles and strategic objectives.

Source: Captives.insure

#Actomate #Global #CaptiveStrategy #RiskManagement #MarketInsight